Morality and Immorality: Actions vs Results Essay

Both Martin Luther King Jr. and Niccolo Machiavelli had their own perspectives on what was moral and fast. King and Machiavelli view what was morality right and how they would use this judgment in government and how it impact people in e trulyday life. King fought a moral fight against what was expound as baseborn laws to oppress blacks during an era of segregation in the United States. He believes that sometime it is moral to take motion against immoral laws to get the results he and others that fought alongside him desired.Machiavelli as a Ruler, during a time when his country was bad and constant political in-fighting, believed it was better to be feared than loved, and he took the immoral action of oppression to gain compliments morally from his seeers as a result. Machiavelli was a believer of the art of war to gain power, patch King believed power was achieved in non-violence. In Letter from Birmingham Jail, King came to Birmingham for what he believed to be crimes aga inst a race of people as injustice. Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere (482).Practicing what he preached, King nonviolent action still landed him in jail. Kings nonviolent campaigns lie in of four basic steps to accomplish sometime unachievable goals. Nonviolent direct action seeks to bring about such a crisis and foster a tension that a community which has constantly refused to negotiate is forced to confront the issue (483). Protesting and marches was organized because the people that were subject to unjust laws k newborn that taking their fight onward a judge in a court room did not stand a chance.These were the very people that want to keep blacks oppressed. We know by dint of painful experience that freedom is never voluntarily given by the oppressor it must be demanded by the oppressed (484). King had specific actions for desired results against immoral unjust laws, but fought back morally by obeying lawful constitution rights. My findings from The Prince , Machiavelli can be described as cunning, evil, and violent.Heavily influenced by pre-Christian political hilosophy, Machiavelli believes violence could gain him respect through fear and determent which a leader need to obtain what he called virtue and prudence. Machiavelli claims Moses killed his own people to enforce his result and would have not been unable to do so if he was not armed. The chief foundations of all states, new as well as old or composite, are well-grounded laws and good arms and as there cannot be good laws where the state is not well armed, it follows that where they are well armed they have good laws (Machiavelli).Machiavelli was cleaver in that he understood the art of providing for his people to ensure they are foster and content, in returning he demand honor and respect from them. He believe, A wise prince should follow similar methods and never remain idle in peaceful times, but industriously make good use of them, so that when fortune changes she may find him prepared to resist her blows, and to prevail in rigourousness (523).Machiavelli actions to use violence as a power of persuading results to how one want to appear to be seen, whether it be better to be loved more than feared, or feared more than loved (526). Inaction can be just as dangerous as taking action, when the results are just as detrimental. Action in the moral sense will reveal results with promises of hope. King led by example, stressed nonviolence through his call for sit-ins and marches. He wanted to end segregation in public life and in strain discrimination.Machiavelli dictated his ideas and how a leader should guide. He believe to protect yourself from an attack is to attack others. King and Machiavelli had distinguishable opinions on how to take action on issues. Their philosophy was similar but their thought process was polar in that, Kings theory was to accomplish change through nonviolence and Machiavelli thoughts was to use duplicity and second gu essing to his advantage. Although both men differ in practices their action was to establish security, love, and honor among men.